Credit Card Chargebacks: A Merchant's Most Difficult Challenge

Joe Q. Merchant, a successful e-commerce businesspolicy.If a product was purchased, the customer
owner, opens a letter from the Chargebackmust return it before a chargeback can be initiated -
Department of his credit card processing company.at least if the customer used a Visa or Mastercard. It
"What's this?" he wonders, intuitively knowing thatis then up to the merchant how to proceed (i.e., to
this can't be good news. His suspicions are proveneither grant or deny a refund). Disputes regarding a
correct when he reads this retrieval request formservice fall in a very gray area. While it is mandatory
where he must provide information about a particularthat the customer attempt to work out an
transaction. While no specific reason is offered as toagreement with the merchant before attempting to
why this request has been initiated, Joe knows thatcharge back payment, such a conference may result
he must comply to avoid a chargeback - wherein a stalemate. The almighty refund policy may help
funds can be taken out of a merchant's account duethe merchant but if there are loopholes, the
to a variety of reasons and placed back into a givencustomer may very well be deemed victorious. And it
customer's account.Joe ponders what went wrongshould be clear that any "tie" goes to the customer;
with this particular transaction. Is it possible that aif the merchant cannot provide conclusive evidence
member of his staff accepted an invalid credit cardthat services rendered were thorough and
(e.g., expired date)? Has there been a processingappropriate or if there exists reasonable doubt, Joe
error (e.g., an input error has been committed whereQ. Merchant will not only have lost time with the
the wrong account has been charged)? Thesecustomer but his money. And if the customer asserts
scenarios are very unlikely, Joe decides. In allthat services were not rendered at all, Joe needs to
probability, a customer has either disputed a) theshow evidence of his work to the processing bank or
validity of the transaction (i.e., whether the customera contract that spells out that he intended to provide
has authorized the transaction) or b) the quality ofservice on a future specified date. Again, any
the service and/or product (i.e., the customer hasinconclusivity that Joe fulfilled his obligation or planned
voiced dissatisfaction and wants a refund).Accordingto will result in a thinner wallet for Joe.Although Joe
to guidelines set by Visa, Mastercard, AmericanQ. Merchant was quick to dismiss the notion that a
Express and Discover, Joe Q. Merchant must replypoint-of-sale processing error transpired, he needs to
with written correspondence, providing all therealize that there exists the possibility for human
requested information - in an expedient fashion - inerror on any given transaction. What happens, for
an attempt to rebut any possible chargeback. (Aexample, if a customer has inadvertently been billed
review committee will eventually render a decision astwice for a product or service? What happens if a
to the legitimacy of a chargeback.) But the retrievalcustomer cancelled a recurring billing charge but was
request has indicated the date that this informationstill assessed a charge? In business, attention to detail
must be received. If the merchant offers evidenceis a must. But if Joe or a member of his staff erred,
of a transaction after this date, a chargeback willa credit to the customer must be issued
ensue and the merchant will automatically lose thoseposthaste.Of course, the best way to prevent
hard-earned dollars that he/she may have alreadychargebacks starts with Joe's actions and not
spent.Online merchants, such as Joe, have morenecessarily the customer's actions. Are safeguards in
difficult obstacles to overcome than retail merchantsplace to prevent processing errors? For instance, on
in the resolution of chargebacks. After all, those whophone orders, do the merchants' representatives
generally swipe credit cards have a transaction slip orensure that every given digit, including the expiration
receipt. If a card does not swipe through a creditdate, is absolutely correct? Are orders confirmed by
card terminal, retail merchants must run the cardfax?; Are phone numbers checked with directory
through a manual imprinter to prove that theenquiries?; Are customers contacted back by phone
transaction was authorized. In contrast, those whoto confirm the telephone number?Internet orders
run businesses online will not have such a physicalneed to be evaluated, too. Are fraud-preventative
receipt proving that the customer authorized the sale.devices, such as the AVS and CVV2/CVC2 code
This is why online transactions are categorized asemployed? Was the customer's address verified by
"card not present" or "customer not present."Everycalling the card issuing bank's Voice Authorization
year, a myriad of chargebacks result whenCenter? (Alternatively, the merchant can
customers claim that they never received theautomatically decline any transaction where there is
merchandise. In such instances, it is imperative thatan AVS mismatch.) Is the refund policy easily
the merchant has a proof of delivery notice,accessible and observable on the website? Does a
indicating the date with the customer's signature. Ifrecognizable Doing Business As (DBA) name with a
the signature on this notice belongs to anotherconcomitant phone number appear on the customers'
individual (e.g, neighbor) or even if the customerstatements? Are signed delivery receipts
claims that he/she never signed for the itemobtained?Logic and intuition are powerful tools in
(signature is not clear), the merchant can lose thepreventing chargebacks, too. If Joe Q. Merchant has
chargeback. It is always best that an online merchantan uneasy feeling about a transaction (e.g., the
use the Address Verification system (AVS) to ensurecustomer is willing to pay additional fees for faster
that the address listed on the customer's credit carddelivery for a high-ticket item, the customer has a
matches the billing address. Moreover, it is advisabledomestic billing address but a foreign shipping
to check for Visa's CVV2 code or Mastercard's CVC2address, etc), he needs to proceed with caution.
code - the three digits printed on credit cards nearHigh-ticket items are profitable but risky and Joe Q.
the signature panel in the back of the card - to helpMerchant must especially perform his due diligence
determine the validity of a sale. This aides thewith such transactions.A yellow light should also
merchant in helping to identify a cardholder in aappear for any foreign order, particularly those that
non-face-to-face transaction.Of course, the merchantoriginate from certain problem countries like
may then insist that the billing address and ship toSingapore or Indonesia. Indeed, Joe needs to weigh
address be the same to reduce the possibility of athe benefits vs. the potential cost of doing business
chargeback. (As an added measure of protection - asoutside the States.Although chargebacks can raise
a proactive maneuver - a merchant may fax atheir ugly head for any merchant, Joe Q. Merchant
customer an order or invoice form and ask that therealizes that by taking a thorough, hands-on and
form be faxed back so that the customer's signaturecautious approach, he can substantially reduce or
may be on file. In another scenario, if the customereliminate their occurrence. As an added measure of
has initiated a chargeback for non-delivery of goods,protection, Joe will conduct business ethically and
before 30 days has elapsed from the time that theresponsibly and reach out towards his customers to
transaction occurred, the merchant can respond thatensure their satisfaction. He will, for example, describe
ample time for shipment was not provided -products and/or services with accurate descriptions,
especially if he/she can submit the terms ofprovide a clear and fair return policy and establish
agreement, indicating the delivery date. If thedialogue, whenever possible, with the customer -
merchant knows that delivery will be delayed, it iseither before, during or after a given
imperative to contact the customer should thetransaction.Advancing technology, to better identify
customer derive the conclusion that the shipmentcustomers (e.g., Verified by Visa or SecureCode
was never made. Moreover, at least with phoneprovided by Mastercard), will serve to reduce fraud
orders, the merchant may even decide to postponeand/or limit chargebacks. But until technology catches
charging the card until the delivery is near completionup with the oft-unpredictable world of e-commerce
or completed.The retrieval request/chargeback battlechargebacks, Joe Q. Merchant can look towards one
becomes even more complex if the customer claimsreliable stop-gap measure: himself.Copyright 2006
that the product or service does not live up to theWilliam HamiltonWilliam Hamilton owns a payment
customer's expectations. If this has occurred, Joe Q.processing company, IntelliCollect (a subsidiary of
Merchant needs to submit his refund policy and proofUnited Bank Card), a firm offering cost-effective
that the customer was made aware of such apayment processing solutions.